FHA loans are perfect for Idaho first time home buyers

June 2, 2010

In 1934, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) was created by the National Housing Act for the primary purpose of insuring long-term residential mortgage loans and, thereby, promoting home ownership in the United States. Today, the FHA is the largest government insurer of mortgages in the world.

FHA loans have surged in popularity. In 2005, government-backed FHA loans represented about 2.8% of total loans originated. Today, the number is closer to 30%. Over the past couple of years, as credit standards tightened, FHA loans have become the loan of choice for many homebuyers.

Contributing to the popularity of FHA loans is that the maximum loan amount limit has increased from $303,750 in Ada County to as much as $729,750 in Blaine County, maximum loan amounts depend on the county in which the home is located. (see http://fhaboise.com/fha-limits/)

Also, if you qualify for a loan, the loan-to-value (LTV) ratios are potentially higher than those for conventional mortgage loans. With FHA loans, a buyer can borrow up to 96.5% of the value of a home. The potential for a higher LTV also makes FHA loans an attractive option for homeowners wanting to refinance. And FHA loans come with fixed mortgage rates providing stable payments over the life of the loan. Also, FHA closing costs can be financed into the total amount of the mortgage.

Traditionally, FHA mortgages were used to assist first-time homebuyers who may not have otherwise qualified for a loan. But FHA loans are no longer just for first-time homebuyers. They are increasingly used by move-up buyers.

If you would like to learn more about the FHA loan process – and how it might help your clients move into a new home – please call me today. 208-287-1717

(Waterstone Mortgage Idaho)


FHA Announces Major Changes, Effective Immediately

January 20, 2010

By Dean Tucker, Waterstone Mortgage – Prime Equity Group in Boise idaho

This morning the FHA announced a series of changes designed to protect the federal agency that has emerged as the cornerstone of the mortgage market as the housing sector wobbles toward recovery. 

Consumers, Lenders and Realtors may find some of these new rules painful — but necessary.  With FHA hovering around 40% of all new loan originations, even these small changes have a major impact on the continued health of the housing market.

Mortgage insurance premium (MIP) will be increased to build up capital reserves and bring back private lending.

  • The first step will be to raise the up-front MIP from 1.75% to 2.25% and request legislative authority to increase the maximum annual (paid monthly) MIP that the FHA can charge.
  • If this authority is granted, then the second step will be to shift some of the premium increase from the up-front MIP to the annual MIP.
  • This shift will allow for the capital reserves to increase with less impact to the consumer, because the annual MIP is paid over the life of the loan instead of at the time of closing
  • The initial up-front increase is included in a Mortgagee Letter to be released tomorrow, January 21st, and will go into effect in the spring.

Update the combination of FICO scores and down payments for new borrowers.

  • New borrowers will now be required to have a minimum FICO score of 580 to qualify for FHA’s 3.5% down payment program. New borrowers with less than a 580 FICO score will be required to put down at least 10%.
  • This allows the FHA to better balance its risk and continue to provide access for those borrowers who have historically performed well.
  • This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February and, after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.

Reduce allowable seller concessions from 6% to 3%

  • The current level exposes the FHA to excess risk by creating incentives to inflate appraised value. This change will bring FHA into conformity with industry standards on seller concessions.
  • This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February, and after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.

Waterstone Mortgage Corporation is a true Mortgage Bankers, we underwrite and fund loans for over 30 of the top mortgage lenders in the country, the “Who’s Who” in mortgage lending. Our parent company, Waterstone  Bank, is $1.9 Billion strong.

(Home)


New rules at FHA could change the way first time home buyers in Boise Idaho purchase homes.

January 19, 2010

David Stevens bought his first home almost 25 years ago, paying just 3% down with a loan backed by the Federal Housing Administration. “I had no money in the bank,” he says. “If it weren’t for the FHA, I wouldn’t have gotten that home.”

Now, as FHA commissioner, Mr. Stevens has to decide how many others to let through that door. Souring FHA-insured mortgages are threatening the agency’s finances. Congress is pressuring him to tighten the easy-money standards that once helped people like him, and he is expected to announce revisions as early as this week.

But raising the credit bar could have a dangerous side effect. In many of the nation’s hardest-hit housing markets, the FHA backs around half of all new home loans. If the agency pulls back too quickly, the nascent housing recovery could fizzle, endangering the economy.

The dilemma puts the 52-year-old former mortgage banker squarely in the middle of the debate over how much the government should do to prop up the housing market, and how much risk taxpayers should take on to do it.

“How big a role do we need to play to keep the housing system functioning?” says Mr. Stevens, referring to the FHA. “Overcorrecting in either direction would be a terrible thing to do right now.”

Mr. Stevens is finalizing possible revisions to credit standards. Options include raising the minimum down payment, establishing a minimum credit score, increasing the amount that borrowers have to pay for mortgage insurance, and reducing the amount of money sellers can kick in for closing costs.

The FHA, created in 1934 to heal the U.S. housing market during the Great Depression, traditionally has helped first-time home buyers and underserved segments of the market. It doesn’t lend money to home buyers, but insures lenders against default on loans that meet FHA criteria, collecting fees for that backing. For decades, thanks to a stable housing market, it turned a profit for taxpayers.

When the housing market was booming, subprime lenders drew away many of the borrowers who traditionally used FHA-backed loans by offering even more favorable terms. Unlike the FHA, subprime lenders didn’t require borrowers to document their incomes. The FHA saw its share of the mortgage market fall to 2% in 2006.

(More) (Home)


Taming the Wild West of FHA Lending

January 14, 2010

Some lenders fault the Department of Housing and Urban Development‘s plan to strengthen the Federal Housing Administration for — of all things — reducing regulation.

Waterstone Mortgage has a networth the exceeds the highest requirement as proposed by HUD.

HUD Secretary Shawn Donovan‘s road map, laid out in congressional testimony last month, was widely viewed as an attempt to raise the bar for companies to do business with FHA. Lenders’ net-worth requirements would rise, for example.

But critics of the proposal say HUD’s attempt to shift responsibility for supervising mortgage brokers from the department to FHA-approved lenders would eventually have the effect of lowering market standards. These lenders are urging HUD to keep its current requirement that brokers of FHA loans maintain a minimum net worth and provide the government with audited financial statements, just as lenders do.

Forcing lenders to monitor brokers without maintaining certain standards would result in a “race to the bottom,” said John Johnson, the president and chief executive of MortgageAmerica Inc., a Birmingham, Ala., lender.

Some lenders would ultimately give up standards to increase production, forcing others to do the same to compete, and repeating the cycle that helped to inflate the last housing bubble, he said.

“There should still be some standards to participate in FHA,” Johnson said. “Unless FHA revises the rule to include audited financials, then that will be the end of them because I can’t require them if the competition doesn’t.”

Similarly, Kevin Marconi, the chief operating officer at United Fidelity Funding, a wholesale and retail lender in Kansas City, Mo., said that rather than scrapping the net-worth minimum for brokers — as HUD has proposed doing — it should raise that requirement from the current $63,000 to somewhere between $100,000 and $150,000.

That would “weed out a lot of fly-by-night broker shops,” Marconi said.

Weeding out the chaff — among lenders and brokers — is certainly one of HUD’s goals.

Since the subprime market imploded in 2007, the FHA, once a mortgage industry backwater, has seen its volume explode.

FHA loans are pretty much the only product lenders can offer most borrowers who have little money for a down payment (unless they qualify for the government’s loan programs for veterans or rural residents).

FHA lending now accounts for 30% of all residential mortgages written, up from 3% in 2006, said Brian Chappelle, a partner at Potomac Partners, a Washington consulting firm.

Higher volume and share has come with higher defaults and losses. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, 8.67% of FHA loans were 90 days overdue or in foreclosure at the end of the third quarter, up from 5.66% three years earlier. In November, a long-awaited audit showed that in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, the FHA’s capital reserve ratio had fallen to 0.53%, well below the congressionally mandated minimum of 2%.

The FHA now says it attracted companies with questionable practices during the growth spurt.

“The mortgage industry is coming out of an unprecedented period where unscrupulous players and institutions without capital, virtually anybody could put out a shingle and call themselves a mortgage lender,” Dave Stevens, the FHA’s commissioner, said in an interview in December.

The agency has stepped up enforcement actions against FHA lenders, including two that collapsed last year, Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. and Ideal Mortgage Bankers Ltd., better known as Lend America.

Opponents and supporters of HUD’s proposed rule agree on one thing: It would make the government mortgage market look more like the conventional one, as large bank-owned lenders gained share.

“HUD wants the bigger, more sophisticated, better-capitalized players out there,” said Paul T. Bossidy, the president and CEO of Clayton Holdings LLC, a Shelton, Conn., company that provides underwriting, due diligence and other services to lenders. The agency is looking for companies with the resources to invest in training and technology, he said.

As a wholly-owned subsidiary of a mid-sized depository Bank, Waterstone Mortgage is a fully approved HUD-FHA Lender. Our networth exceeds the higher $2.5M that HUD is proposing. The raised requirements are an excellent way to improve loan quality and help strengthen HUDs balance sheet. — Dean Tucker

Many small lenders said the proposed hike to their minimum net worth would put them out of business. HUD wants to raise the requirement from $250,000 to $2.5 million over three years. That would disqualify 70% of the FHA’s current roster of lenders (assuming none of them raised their net worth in the meantime).

“Big banks have a lot of expenses and no need to be competitive,” said Jeff Lewis, the chairman of Generation Mortgage Co., an Atlanta lender. “But there’s a mind-set right now in Washington that the best way to protect consumers is to restrict competition.”

Yet even some of the largest lenders want HUD to let brokers continue closing loans in their own name and maintain case numbers, to help the Goliaths manage their own risk.

For example, many lenders said they rely on the FHA’s Neighborhood Watch Web site to monitor and compare the default ratios of brokers.

“If HUD stopped providing compare ratios for correspondents, it is quite possible that loan quality would suffer,” Rick Aneshansel, the chief financial officer at U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, a unit of U.S. Bancorp, wrote in a comment letter — one of about 250 HUD has received since it issued the proposed rule in November.

David Moskowitz, deputy general counsel at Wells Fargo & Co., recommended in a comment letter that HUD maintain a recertification program for brokerages that includes background checks of key officers and directors and an assurance that brokers are not on any previous list of debarment.

Other changes to the FHA are coming quickly this year as well. Donovan has indicated that HUD may try to raise the current cap on annual mortgage insurance premiums, which would require congressional approval.

Policymakers also are considering increasing the minimum down payment for FHA borrowers and adopting a minimum FICO score for the first time.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.